Hi, On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 07:31:19AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> The short summary is Lightspark is not suitable, as it's a plugin > only, and not a library. The Lightspark team had no interest in making > the types of changes we'd need. Other issues are it's OpenGL only, > uses LLVM, etc... To use Lightspark we'd have to write an NPAPI > wrapper for Gnash to "plugin" Lightspark. Well, while it would be nice to use lightspark as a library, given that this won't happen, the question to ask is: how much effort would it be to *fork* the lightspark code, to use as a base for AVM2 support in Gnash? Tamarin is probably more mature (AIUI it's actual code from Adobe's proprietary player); but the fact that lightspark already implements the most important AS3 classes, might actually outweigh this. (If they can be integrated into Gnash in a sane manner...) Or perhaps it might even be possible to do both: take Tamarin as the AVM2 engine, and the AS3 classes from lightspark? -antrik- _______________________________________________ Gnash-dev mailing list Gnash-dev@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash-dev
