On Thursday 18 May 2006 13:07, Bastiaan Jacques wrote:
> It strikes me as odd that
> the compiler accepts the address of something which is not of type as_value
> as the second argument to set_member_default (const as_value &)

Actually, as_value has quite a few constructors available which are called 
implicitly here.

-- 
Bastiaan


_______________________________________________
Gnash mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash

Reply via email to