On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 01:26:38PM +0200, Bastiaan Jacques wrote: > On Thursday 18 May 2006 13:07, Bastiaan Jacques wrote: > > It strikes me as odd that > > the compiler accepts the address of something which is not of type as_value > > as the second argument to set_member_default (const as_value &) > > Actually, as_value has quite a few constructors available which are called > implicitly here.
I'm cleaning up the code tracking this down, and debugging output changes by just movin code around. This usually means wild pointers. --strk; _______________________________________________ Gnash mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnash
