On sam, 2009-08-01 at 10:37 +0200, Benedikt Ahrens wrote: > aurelien wrote: > > On sam, 2009-08-01 at 10:16 +0200, Benedikt Ahrens wrote: > >> Hello Aurelien, > >> > >> this update will not delete the 2.6.30 kernel. It will only replace the > >> 2.6.24 by another 2.6.24. > >> > >> ben > >> > >> aurelien wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> The update system alert me that there's update for the system. > >>> It want to update kernel 2.6.30.3 > 2.6.24.24 > >>> > >>> The system alert don't look by itself on sort of compare way ? > >>> Or the update alert system estimate that it's dangerous to use another > >>> kernel than itself ? > >>> > >>> aurelien > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> gNewSense-dev mailing list > >>> [email protected] > >>> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev > >>> > > > > Hello Ben, > > > > Thanks for your help ! > > > > But why the module update manager don't understand by it self that is > > not necessary ? > > Or there is an interest ? > > > > aurelien > > Of course there is an interest: avoid security holes in your operating > system. > The update manager will update ALL the packages on your system, > independent of the question whether you use them or not. If you want to > avoid this, you must remove the unused packages or set them to "hold" in > the package manager. Both of these do NOT make any sense in your case. > Just let the system update the 2.6.24. It won't do any harm. > > ben
Hello Ben, I don't want to remove the update packages mangager (certainly not). i just want to knows why is not able to understant that the last kernel must be certainly better than an older. 2.6.30.3 > 2.6.24. aurele _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
