On Sat, 01 Aug 2009 21:06:45 +0200 aurelien <[email protected]> wrote:
> On sam, 2009-08-01 at 10:37 +0200, Benedikt Ahrens wrote: > > aurelien wrote: > > > On sam, 2009-08-01 at 10:16 +0200, Benedikt Ahrens wrote: > > >> Hello Aurelien, > > >>> The update system alert me that there's update for the system. > > >>> It want to update kernel 2.6.30.3 > 2.6.24.24 > > >>> > > >>> The system alert don't look by itself on sort of compare way ? > > >>> Or the update alert system estimate that it's dangerous to use > > >>> another kernel than itself ? > > > > The update manager will update ALL the packages on your system, > > independent of the question whether you use them or not. If you > > want to avoid this, you must remove the unused packages or set them > > to "hold" in the package manager. Both of these do NOT make any > > sense in your case. Just let the system update the 2.6.24. It won't > > do any harm. > > > > Hello Ben, > > I don't want to remove the update packages mangager (certainly not). > i just want to knows why is not able to understant that the last > kernel must be certainly better than an older. 2.6.30.3 > 2.6.24. Firstly, newer != better. Just stop kidding yourself. Secondly, its probably left the .30 kernel in place, but re-set the .24 the default kernel. kk > aurele > -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
