On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:16:31 +0200 Sam Geeraerts <sam...@elmundolibre.be> wrote:
> Sam Geeraerts schreef: > > Karl Goetz schreef: > >> I have changed the status of the bug[1]. Its now NEEDSINFO, > >> BLOCKER, target release deltah (2.3). > >> > >> I'll adjust the status when we get word back from the FSF as to > >> their opinion. > >> > >> Sam/Benedikt, have either of you emailed the FSF yet? > > > > I assume nobody has up until now, so I've just sent them an email. > Hi Sam, > > The team working on gNewSense are trying to decide what to do > about the > amslatex software. > > My short answer is: include it :) . > > Considering that AMS probably own all > the code in the package, > > They do. > > is this an acceptable way of dealing with the situation? > > It's certainly suboptimal, but I think it would be a terrible > overreaction to exclude amslatex just because of that. Let's hope > they fix all their files soon. I see. Then I think we can leave it where it is. I still think we should include an updated licence file for it though; and a reference back to this discussion. Thoughts on that? kk -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list gNewSense-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
