Karl Goetz wrote: > On Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:16:31 +0200 > Sam Geeraerts <sam...@elmundolibre.be> wrote: > >> Sam Geeraerts schreef: >>> Karl Goetz schreef: >>>> I have changed the status of the bug[1]. Its now NEEDSINFO, >>>> BLOCKER, target release deltah (2.3). >>>> >>>> I'll adjust the status when we get word back from the FSF as to >>>> their opinion. >>>> >>>> Sam/Benedikt, have either of you emailed the FSF yet? >>> I assume nobody has up until now, so I've just sent them an email. >> Hi Sam, >> >> The team working on gNewSense are trying to decide what to do >> about the >> amslatex software. >> >> My short answer is: include it :) . >> >> Considering that AMS probably own all >> the code in the package, >> >> They do. >> >> is this an acceptable way of dealing with the situation? >> >> It's certainly suboptimal, but I think it would be a terrible >> overreaction to exclude amslatex just because of that. Let's hope >> they fix all their files soon. > > I see. > Then I think we can leave it where it is. I still think we should > include an updated licence file for it though; and a reference back to > this discussion. Thoughts on that? > kk
You might want to reply to the AMS. They promised to deliver an updated license text, in case we ask them for it. I am not sure whether it is the latest version of the AMS packages that are shipped with gNS. If not, AMS should also change the license of the older versions. I can do that next week, but not any sooner. ben _______________________________________________ gNewSense-dev mailing list gNewSense-dev@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-dev
