andrei raevsky wrote: > Hi, > > I am just curious - why "burning dog"? It does not bother me in the least, > but it does sound like some poor animal has been set on fire, does it not? > (which at least fire fox does not). Would something like blazing wolf (-: > or - better - scintillating canid :-) not sound less RSPCA-provoking? > Start with: for naming be punny
fire fox see ice weasel it has to be different due to upstream burning dog burn dog burn does not read as well as burning if you want to build a myth then burning is seen in some traditions as a good thing as it renews the land and removes that which thwarts growth but that is taking it way too far P. _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
