-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 andrei raevsky wrote: > Hi, > > I am just curious - why "burning dog"? It does not bother me in the least, > but it does sound like some poor animal has been set on fire, does it not? > (which at least fire fox does not). Would something like blazing wolf (-: > or - better - scintillating canid :-) not sound less RSPCA-provoking?
I would have used 'flameferret' :) /Tryggvi -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFGCuvZTfUwC3N5Fj0RAgS2AKDbu3plBHSWwd1W7vVoSisBDyBatQCg2ORd gIBiSZ5RuUBe/Xn11pxAZ0M= =yXXn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
