In a message dated: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 19:52:12 EDT
mike ledoux said:
>On Tue, Aug 20, 2002 at 11:01:01AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> Well, I think it's more that they're lazy. Why type $OUTPUT_AUTOFLUSH
>> when you can type $| instead? If someone who doesn't know the
>> language needs to know what $| does, it's well documented.
>
>I see this sort of claim fairly frequently from the Perl crowd, usually
>accompanied by 'everything you need to know is in perldoc'. Yet every
>time I need to figure out what one of these obscure no-letter variables
>does, perldoc falls down:
>
> mwl@voyager:~>perldoc '$|'
> No documentation found for "$|".
That's because you're not using perldoc correctly.
Do perldoc perldoc for proper usage, for the magic vars use
'perldoc perlvar'. A complete list of the "perldocs" is available
using 'perldoc perl'.
--
Seeya,
Paul
--
It may look like I'm just sitting here doing nothing,
but I'm really actively waiting for all my problems to go away.
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
_______________________________________________
gnhlug-discuss mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
