On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, at 8:52pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Are all of RH N.0 release typically accompanied by more problems then > the N.1 or N.2 releases ?
Take the "of RH" out of there, and you will have a more useful statement. While I am convinced that it is possible to engineer major changes in software that do not result in a product with more bugs than Maine in June, I am also convinced that such an occurrence is extremely unlikely to occur. As such, I always wait after any major software release, to see how it works out. I always test any major software release before putting it into production use. I do this regardless of Red Hat, Microsoft, Novell, or whoever. You will find even the most zealous supporters of Microsoft advocate the same thing. > Is RH duplicating the problems automobile manufacturers have whenever they > bring out a new car model? The more they change the more that is broken? I think the parallel you draw is a fairly accurate assessment of the situation. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
