I think that find has been around longer than cpio. I also think that it is an immensely useful Unix utility. Recursive descent was added to commands like ls and cp more recently. But, ls is more humanly usable. "Tom Buskey" wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > > The ls(1) command is oriented more towards human consumption. The find(1) > > >command simple outputs a list of filenames, which is more suitable for > >consumption by other programs. > > I think find was targeted for use with cpio originally. They both had > the same author. They deal with arguments and options a bit different > then the other standard unix tools. > > I'm almost surprised someone hasn't come up with a find replacement that > "feels" more like the other unix tools. Tar certainly replaced cpio. > Then again, find works well as it is and I'm not sure you could replace > its syntax as easily. > > -- > ------- > Tom Buskey > > > _______________________________________________ > gnhlug-discuss mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss >
-- Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org PGP key id:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
