On Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:57:48 -0500, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
As usual, I'm responsible for the two addresses. The [EMAIL PROTECTED] is an alias for [email protected], and was created because someone complained about the real address being too hard to type/remember.
There are insurmountable technical reasons (as far as I'm concerned) for keeping [email protected], so if anything, we should remove [EMAIL PROTECTED] I suspect the reason [EMAIL PROTECTED] is appearing in mail messages, is because someone's MUA is placing it on the address line; I don't believe its in any mailman definitions anywhere.
Is everyone in agreement with this? [I say, ducking in advance.]
--Bruce
The short-form addresses are currently listed as acceptable To and CC aliases
in the config file. Disabling recognition of them should block the duplicates
from the list. So yes, I agree as well.
Mark _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
