> > On 7/9/08, Labitt, Bruce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Anyone got any > > suggestions? Pitfalls on how I am thinking about things? >
It seems to me that using any of the "traditional" mount points in this situation is somewhat inappropriate; the new drive is intended primarily as a resource for another machine. Given that, Thomas' suggestion of /bladeimages is a pretty sensible one. I tend to mount shared net drives on mountpoints like "/share", or mount a RAID on /raid, make a directory called "share" on it, and share that directory. It makes it obvious what physical resource is associated with the mountpoint, and you can use symlinks to organize things in a logical sense. I dislike the /mnt suggestion because to me, /mnt is for a foreign filesystem, e.g. something that might be removed. On the blade server, however, I'd probably mount the shared net filesystem under /mnt, for reasons mentioned in VAB's reply. --DTVZ
_______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/