Ah, com'on Kenny... Don't be an American (read, type, defend), be a Linux developer (read, think, type)! Moving the discussion *about* job postings is not the same as moving the job postings! I believe the consensus is to keep the job postings in the general list until they warrant their own list. "Kenneth E. Lussier" wrote: > > <SEMI-RANT> > OK, I have a question about this. If people are concerned about the waste > of bandwith (both digital and human) and want it moved over to gnhlug-org, > and people subscribe to gnhlug-org, isn't the bandwith still wasted since > all of the same people will be reading it?? I though the point of the org > list was to discuss functionality/purpose/direction of the LUG, not what > should or shouldn't be on the mailing list. It seems to me that the general > populous of the list can decide for themselves what they want to read and > what they don't. Besides, if a newbie (like myself) sees a job posting for > a Linux person, it might let them know that they aren't just wasting their > time, and there are practical applications for what they are trying to learn. > </SEMI-RANT> > Kenny > At 10:29 AM 2/3/00 -0500, you wrote: > >On Thu, 3 Feb 2000, Derek Martin wrote: > >> There is a lot of stuff that goes on in the gnhlug-org that most people > >> just aren't interested in, and the decision about what to do affects EVERY > >> gnhlug subscriber. > > > > If they aren't interested in the decisions that get made, then they > >shouldn't be surprised when they get made. > > > > Anyone can sub or unsub to gnhlug-org. The whole *point* of gnhlug-org is > >to keep traffic like this endless debate about job postings off the regular > >list.
