On Fri, 2004-01-30 at 19:41, Ed Lawson wrote: > It seems to me there have been two thoughtful postings late yesterday and essentially no response. Not even a "What are you talking about?" > > This seems a bit ominous to me for the reasons cogently stated by Maddog. > > So now what?
Now we get on the ball? I think the postings did a good job of summing up everything and essentially was a good analysis. But it killed the controversy, so people have lost interest in saying much more. Now, if some action items were assigned, then the controversy factor would kick in, and we'd have some more activity in this mailing list. I'm trying to stay out of things because I'll be away for a while (until March, but that may change). And connectivity is a bit of a pain where I'm going - not only is it hard to get to, its expensive too - at least until I get the lines and equipment installed - but that requires a certain unnamed government to pay some bills... But when I get back (assuming I have some income), I should be able to participate a bit more. Probably giving talks and things. --Bruce
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
