> Windows 2000 is not a good choice for the new user since
What amazes me is how the computer trade press hasn't said anything about
the name game.
I mean, presently, since Win95, the numbered versions were DOS-based.
Lettered versions -- i.e. NT -- were NT kernel-based.
With 2000, Microsoft did a 180 degree turn -- and no one is saying
anything. Win2K is NT-based, and the forthcoming WinME is DOS-based.
There are going to be *millions* of consumers who are going to go out and
buy Win2000 thinking, logically, that it's an upgrade for Win98. Those
people are going to find that their device drivers don't work, and that
their 5-year old's favorite game doesn't work. When they complain, they'll
be told, "just wait until this summer and upgrade WindowsME, that'll fix
things!"
It just amazes me that more isn't said of this deception.
--
Regards, | Debian GNU/ __ o http://www.debian.org
. | / / _ _ _ _ _ __ __
Randy | / /__ / / / \// //_// \ \/ /
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) | /____/ /_/ /_/\/ /___/ /_/\_\
http://www.golgotha.net | because lockups should only be for convicts.
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
