"Steven W. Orr" wrote: > > I've said it before, but I'll say it again: "Hold on there > Bullwinkle!" :-) > > Bash is 100% ksh compliant. And ksh is a superset of sh. Bash provides Sorry. Bash is, (as far as the authors think), 100% Posix compliant (when -o posix is set). It is not 100% ksh compliant (even if there were only 1 ksh "standard", bash would still not be compliant, but there are at least 3 ksh "standard versions" in common circulation.) > ... ********************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter: unsubscribe gnhlug **********************************************************
- Re: How do you..... Derek Martin
- Re: How do you..... Farrell Woods
- Re: How do you..... Kevin D. Clark
- Re: How do you..... ccb
- Bashing sea shells and bash shell (was: How ... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash shell (w... Steven W. Orr
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash she... Kevin D. Clark
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash... Jerry Feldman
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash... Jerry Callen
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash she... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash she... Bruce Dawson
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash she... Paul Lussier
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash shell (w... Paul Lussier
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash she... Niall Kavanagh
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash... Derek Martin
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash... Jeffry Smith
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash... ccb
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash... Derek Martin
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash... Kevin D. Clark
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash... Derek Martin
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash... Michael McKernan
