I tend to agree with Kevin. I use ksh on platforms that do not support bash, and bash on Linux. I try to write my scripts to be sh,bash and ksh compliant. The I/O redirection (eg xxxx > foo 2>&1 is an sh ism). On 16 Jun 2000, at 12:27, Kevin D. Clark wrote: > In my opinion bash is nicer for interactive use than ksh. Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Associate Director Boston Linux and Unix user group http://www.blu.org ********************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter: unsubscribe gnhlug **********************************************************
- Re: How do you..... Derek Martin
- Re: How do you..... Benjamin Scott
- Re: How do you..... Kevin D. Clark
- Re: How do you..... Derek Martin
- Re: How do you..... Farrell Woods
- Re: How do you..... Kevin D. Clark
- Re: How do you..... ccb
- Bashing sea shells and bash shell (was: How do... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash shell (was... Steven W. Orr
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash shell... Kevin D. Clark
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash s... Jerry Feldman
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash s... Jerry Callen
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash shell... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash shell... Bruce Dawson
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash shell... Paul Lussier
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash shell (was... Paul Lussier
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash shell... Niall Kavanagh
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash s... Derek Martin
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash s... Jeffry Smith
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash s... ccb
- Re: Bashing sea shells and bash s... Derek Martin
