I tend to agree with Kevin. I use ksh on platforms that do not support 
bash, and bash on Linux. I try to write my scripts to be sh,bash and ksh 
compliant. 

The I/O redirection (eg xxxx > foo 2>&1 is an sh ism). 

On 16 Jun 2000, at 12:27, Kevin D. Clark wrote:

> In my opinion bash is nicer for interactive use than ksh.  
Jerry Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Associate Director
Boston Linux and Unix user group
http://www.blu.org

**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************

Reply via email to