On Wed, 27 Sep 2000, Paul Lussier wrote:
> With the exception of apps distributed in a binary-only fashion, what's so
> hard of just using a "smart" source rpm.

  Aside from the already noted problems with requiring compilers, development
packages, and the like:

  At that point, why not just use a tarball with the original source?

> This gives you the benefits of RPM and the benefits of compiling from
> source.

  The benefits of RPM are mainly with pre-compiled packages.  :-)

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| "Suppose you were an idiot.  And suppose you were a member of Congress. |
|  But I repeat myself."  -- Mark Twain                                   |


**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************

Reply via email to