[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Maybe he meant that their current IT people didn't know more
> Linux than the students, and the current IT people didn't want to
> learn anything new. It does eat up a lot of time re-re-learning M$,
> and that doesn't leave much time to learn Linux, or anything else.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > He said cost was not an issue for NT since the
> > software from MS could be obtained for little cost and it was easy to
> > obtain MS certified people. On the other hand Linux knowledgeable
> > people were hard to find, more expensive, and he thought it would be
> > hard for the current staff to learn Linux.
>
> Bob Sparks
> Never attribute to malice, that which can be explained by stupidity.
> Never attribute to stupidity, that which can be explained by lack of
> information.
>
> **********************************************************
> To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
> *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
> unsubscribe gnhlug
> **********************************************************
well i'd would assume most people that have so called learned Micro$lum and
do not want to learn anything else should most likely go shovel dirt
instead for a local construction union or something..... just my thought..
becuase those type of people are 'on the job retirement employees' and slow
down the progress of the industry.
:) chris
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
