On 1 Oct, Benjamin Scott wrote: > On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Steven W. Orr wrote: >> For the last year my system with 256Meg and 256 swap was barely adequate. >> Now I'm not even touching swap at all. Tres' cool. > > Does anyone know if this fixes "all" the major issues with the 2.4 VM, or > just "some" of them? (I was following development for awhile, but after > 2.4.5 came out and it still sucked mud, I got disgusted and started spending > that time on other projects...)
Linux Weekly News (lwn.net) had a nice summary of the 2.4.10 VM changes at http://lwn.net/2001/0927/kernel.php3 . Essentially, "everyone" is complaining about the massive changes in 2.4.10 except for the users. I haven't seen anything about it in Kernel Traffic yet, though... -- Stephen Ryan Debian GNU/Linux Technology Coordinator Center for Educational Outcomes at Dartmouth College ********************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter: unsubscribe gnhlug **********************************************************
