>> I can testify that not ALL instances of 2.4.x are
>> broken. One of the machines I use at work is an
>> SMP Mac that normally has multiple users logged in
>> running multiple simultaneous builds and generally
>> beating on the system pretty thoroughly with heavy
>
>
>Is it someone's desktop or is it just a remote server / compile box?
The machine in question is primarily a build box -
we run various X clients (like xterm) on it but
essentially never run the server or any of those
thunder-pig apps that accumulate huge working sets
and require snappy GUI behavior. If that's what's
supposed to be broken in 2.4.x then the system in
question clearly isn't representative. I was just
trying to dispel the implication that your computer
would collapse into a bubbling pool of slag if you
were foolish enough to give 2.4.x a test drive... ;->
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
