In a message dated: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 14:47:18 EST
Benjamin Scott said:
> Ah ha! That gives you *Debian*'s version of cpio. Not the GNU tarball,
>but something modified. Extensively, as it turns out (thanks again for
>sending me that source). For the better, I suspect. I notice that both GNU
>tar and GNU cpio seem to fall into the "unmaintained" category. :-(
Ahh, interesting. That probably explains why RH ships with mt-st
rather than the gnu cpio package.
I find it surprising that the Gnu Project would let something like
cpio/mt fall into the unmaintained category. Don't they do backups?
<evil grin size=large>
<Mwaaaahaaaahaaaaa volume=loud level=sinister>
Hmmmm, I wonder if they need a sysadmin
</Mwaaaahaaaahaaaaa>
</evil grin>
--
Seeya,
Paul
----
God Bless America!
...we don't need to be perfect to be the best around,
and we never stop trying to be better.
Tom Clancy, The Bear and The Dragon
*****************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
*****************************************************************
