In a message dated: Mon, 03 Dec 2001 14:40:41 EST
mike ledoux said:
>I think you misunderstood. I was saying here that we can only expect
>to populate this image database if we take reasonable precautions to
>ensure that privacy concerns are met. I've already explained what I think
>reasonable precautions are, and have been continuing this discussion in
>the hopes of determining what other people think would be reasonable.
>
>> >> >Exactly. What I'm trying to do is define the scope of our community.
>> >> >The most reasonable thing I can think of to determine membership in the
>> >> >'GNHLUG faces' community is to have your face in it. If I can't see
>> >> >what you look like, why should you be able to see what I look like?
>> >>
>> >> That sounds reasonable to me :)
>> >
>> >Good, that's what I've been trying to say all along.
>>
>> Then why didn't you just say so? ;)
>
>I did. Several times.
It seems that you and I are in quite violent agreement over this
issue, yet no one else seems to be at all interested, never mind
actually having an opinion.
So, at this point, I recommend we bury the already quite dead horse
until someone else decides to exhume said carcass :)
>Would you like a KITN? :]
No thanks, you can give mine to Derek ;)
--
Seeya,
Paul
----
God Bless America!
...we don't need to be perfect to be the best around,
and we never stop trying to be better.
Tom Clancy, The Bear and The Dragon
*****************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
*****************************************************************
