On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, mike ledoux wrote: > I've seen this claim a number of times, and have never really understood > it. Why should you not point a MX record at a CNAME?
'cause the RFCs say not to. Sure, most mailers deal with it, but there is no guarantee it will not cause problems down the road. Why ask for trouble? -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************
