On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Bill Mullen wrote:

> On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, Joshua S. Freeman wrote:
> 
> 
> Well, it seems very eager to hang up on me, I'll say that, but it's making
> the initial connection at least ... though I'd feel a lot better if your
> server made some small effort to identify itself ... can you retrieve via
> POP from other networks? 

now that I've test that.. it would seem, no.. i can't

Do you use SSL (pop3s) instead of regular POP?

nope

> Are there any restrictions based on IP address on the POP daemon (that
> haven't been updated since AT&T recently made a bunch of IP subnet number
> changes)? 
maybe.. where should I look for those?

>Does it listen on something other than standard POP port 110?
nope

> Any recent changes to the POP daemon config, or maybe the firewall config?

nope
 
> Perhaps this technique will help:
> 
> http://linuxdocs.org/HOWTOs/mini/Secure-POP+SSH.html

i'll check it out...

THANKS

> <punmode=truly_horrid>
> Keep us posted, ok?
> </punmode>
> 
> -- 
> 
> Bill Mullen
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Dec 5, 2001
> 
> 

         -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-
           Joshua S. Freeman | preferred email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]  
                   pgp public key: finger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                          http://www.threeofus.com
                 -+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-


*****************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
*****************************************************************

Reply via email to