I sincerely believe that PGP-signed email messages have a legitimate use. No, I'm serious! I really do. I will probably someday send or receive a message about which (with a straight face) I can say, "Yep!! that there was one IMPORTANT message - I sure am glad I had some serious encryption befitting its significance." And I'll probably transmit it as a MIME-encoded, TNEF-garbled, RichText-enhanced thing of beauty with a redundant HTML version attached, too, just to celebrate the occasion. And I'll ROT13 the headers - yeah! that's the ticket! ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************
- GPG and different mailers plussier
- Re: GPG and different mailers plussier
- Re: GPG and different mailers plussier
- Re: GPG and different mailers plussier
- Re: GPG and different mailers Derek D. Martin
- Re: GPG and different mailers Tom Buskey
- Re: GPG and different mailers Jerry Feldman
- Re: GPG and different mailers Benjamin Scott
- Re: GPG and different mai... Michael O'Donnell
- Re: GPG and different mai... Paul Lussier
- Re: GPG and different mai... Michael O'Donnell
- Re: GPG and different mai... Michael O'Donnell
- Re: GPG and different mai... Derek D. Martin
- Re: GPG and different mai... Kenneth E. Lussier
- Re: GPG and different mai... Jerry Feldman
- Re: GPG and different mailers Benjamin Scott
- Re: GPG and different mailers Kenneth E. Lussier
- Re: GPG and different mailers John Abreau
- Re: GPG and different mailers Derek D. Martin
