The theory is that if there is unilateral copy protection dictated by the content providers and imposed by the government, then the content providers will provide more content via the www and hdtv. Without copy protection, they will not allow content onto the web, and this hurts consumers because they will have fewer choices. If you don't believe them, just as the Distinguished Senetor from Disney Land. After all, Michael Eisner payed good money for this legislation. If he buys a senetor, does that make him a consumer? ;-)
C-Ya, Kenny On Thu, 2002-03-21 at 15:51, Michael Costolo wrote: > How exactly does unilateral copy protection promote consumer broadband and > digital television? Am I missing something or is it just an intentionally > misleading name? > > -Mike- ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************
