On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 09:06:23AM -0500, Derek D. Martin wrote: [snip]
> patches... "Broken and misbehaving" to me means it doesn't do what > the man pages say it does, or does so inconsistently, or core dumps > semi-regularly. Unfortunately, most software I've used falls into one > of those categories... Yup, that pretty much mirrors my experience. :-( > I'm sorta of the opinion that *all* software sucks; *nix just sucks > less, and Linux least of those. Something I've said to at least a few people who have complained about something in Linux. > pick) to change it. Red Hat with updates is usually very stable and > reliable, in my experience.] This is also my experience. And in terms of security, if you follow Linux Weekly News (http://lwn.net/) at all, for quite a while now I've noticed that their list of vulnerabilities with lists of distributions with fixes, past and present, consistly has Red Hat listed as either previously fixed (sometimes several months previous) or the only one or one of a very short list of current fixes. Today, it seems rare that a known vulnerability festers in Red Hat. Mind you, it wasn't always like this. I do remember Red Hat getting low scores in this area, at least by LWN standards. > I've also been meaning to check out the *BSDs for years now, and I > know many of its fans regard it as much better than Linux. Fans regard it much better? Isn't that a redundant statement? I would think they are fans of it *because* they regard it as much better. No matter, I have a great deal of respect for the BSDs, save Theo de Ratts' cockiness. However, I've tried NetBSD, and OpenBSD and sat through someone else installing FreeBSD. I find their install routines quite rough, even compared to Debian (not a jab -- the initial install doesn't define the OS). I also believe that their statements about network performance outclassing Linux is a bit dated. I don't think anyone's done any good network load comparison between the Linux 2.4 kernel and the BSDs. Much rework has gone into the network subsystem of Linux in recent years, so lets see them go head to head with recent code before judging them. Incidentally, though still a little rough around the edges, I found a typical install of NetBSD to be one of absolute fastest install of any OS out there. Yes it's stripped down, but comparing it to even OpenBSD is almost laughable. Kudos to Margo Seltzer and others on the NetBSD team for at least that feat. -- -Paul Iadonisi Senior System Administrator Red Hat Certified Engineer / Local Linux Lobbyist Ever see a penguin fly? -- Try Linux. GPL all the way: Sell services, don't lease secrets ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************
