It is more the case where Microsoft was able to use some of their clout. Developers will upgrade on a single target because of competition, but have no real incentive to port to a secondary target.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Win95 did a much poorer job of running Win16 applications than OS/2 did. > Not that Win95 did any better running Win32 applications. Microsoft just > told developers that Win16 was the problem. So developers promptly ran out > and bought all the new Win95 development tools. Which, of course, do a poor > job of supporting older environments, forcing users to upgrade to Win95. -- -- Gerald Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Boston Computer Solutions and Consulting ICQ#156300 PGP Key ID:C5061EA9 PGP Key fingerprint:053C 73EC 3AC1 5C44 3E14 9245 FB00 3ED5 C506 1EA9 ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************
