On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 12:03:12PM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 6/3/06, Olav Vitters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >On Sat, Jun 03, 2006 at 08:46:16AM +0200, Vincent Untz wrote: > >> While 1000 bugs per day would be nice for my bugzilla points (most of > >> the bugs should be duplicates for crashers), there's no way for us to > >> manually deal with this number of bugs. > > > >I agree, so what are our options? > <snip> > > Another thing we could do (on a much smaller scale than your other > suggestions but potentially useful already to the big modules) is to > finally make unconfirmed/confirmed actually be useful. Add a > preference for whether people (mainly developers) receive email for > unconfirmed bugs (overridden if they are the reporter or on cc). Then
That is the easy part. Standard in Bugzilla: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > maintainers don't have to be deluged with all the new emails and > follow-ups from the bugsquad. We could also give out canconfirm > permissions more widely (automatic after receiving 5 points or > something like that?). Also pretty easy. I think when designing the new show_bug interface I didn't expect people to only have canconfirm (meaning that the interface might not actually allow them to confirm bugs). However, that can be checked and fixed. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
