I see. Don't panic :) Lot of us have been doing different works and are quite excited in general: for example Alex have been setting up CI for Flatpak builds and we enabled a server with privileges for this reason too, I received more request for the pilot program than we can handle, I receive positive outside and internal feedback, etc.
I just want to make sure everyone knows the option to not move exists, and all depends on you and your feedback. Best -- Carlos Soriano GNOME Foundation Treasurer, Board of Directors On Mon, Oct 2, 2017 at 2:05 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:20 PM Carlos Soriano <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hey Philip, >> >> > it was pretty much going to happen unless something went drastically >> > wrong >> >> Not sure I would say it with those words, but yes, we are in the same >> situation as it was before and things keep progressing well. >> >> But this has to come with community built-in, and not only I cannot >> control that, but it's also hard to quantify. So I don't really want >> to commit myself into an answer for that as for now, it depends on all >> of you, specially those in the pilot program giving feedback to us and >> the rest of the community. I'll keep doing my best trying to quantify >> the community agreement/satisfaction (+ all the technical part and >> discussion with GitLab people about our priorities, etc. of course). >> >> Hope is clearer now, or at least know why I cannot be clearer :) > > > OK. I have been doing some research and was planning to spend some effort > creating a proper CI pipeline for merge requests and releases after GJS gets > moved over, and I had a momentary panic about whether it would be wise to > spend that time when it's unclear if we're staying with Gitlab. _______________________________________________ gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
