On Sun, Oct 1, 2017 at 3:20 PM Carlos Soriano <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hey Philip, > > > it was pretty much going to happen unless something went drastically > wrong > > Not sure I would say it with those words, but yes, we are in the same > situation as it was before and things keep progressing well. > > But this has to come with community built-in, and not only I cannot > control that, but it's also hard to quantify. So I don't really want > to commit myself into an answer for that as for now, it depends on all > of you, specially those in the pilot program giving feedback to us and > the rest of the community. I'll keep doing my best trying to quantify > the community agreement/satisfaction (+ all the technical part and > discussion with GitLab people about our priorities, etc. of course). > > Hope is clearer now, or at least know why I cannot be clearer :) > OK. I have been doing some research and was planning to spend some effort creating a proper CI pipeline for merge requests and releases after GJS gets moved over, and I had a momentary panic about whether it would be wise to spend that time when it's unclear if we're staying with Gitlab.
_______________________________________________ gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
