Are you really planning to freeze the libgda HEAD for GNOME 2.12? I have
fairly strong doubts that this is possible? I don't think that this new
API has really had enough testing, though that's partly my fault for not
wrapping it for C++ yet (partly because it was changing so much).

And I think it should have been officially frozen at the GNOME 2.12 API
freeze time to reach real API freeze at the same time as GNOME 2.12.

I know of at least one bug that should be fixed before a .0 version
because you couldn't really fix it afterwards:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311967

Ideally this would be done too:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310226

This would be nice too:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103230

I will try to wrap it soon for libgdamm, now that it's settled down a
bit.

-- 
Murray Cumming
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com


_______________________________________________
gnome-db-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list

Reply via email to