On Sun, 2005-08-21 at 14:33 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > Are you really planning to freeze the libgda HEAD for GNOME 2.12?
yes, we're already frozen > I have > fairly strong doubts that this is possible? I don't think that this new > API has really had enough testing, though that's partly my fault for not > wrapping it for C++ yet (partly because it was changing so much). > well, right, more testing would have been much better. In any case, if you are quick enough, we can do some exceptions to the freeze and commit a few changes, so please go ahead :) > And I think it should have been officially frozen at the GNOME 2.12 API > freeze time to reach real API freeze at the same time as GNOME 2.12. > when was/is the 2.12 API freeze? > I know of at least one bug that should be fixed before a .0 version > because you couldn't really fix it afterwards: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311967 > > Ideally this would be done too: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=310226 > > This would be nice too: > http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103230 > ok, will look at those bugs > I will try to wrap it soon for libgdamm, now that it's settled down a > bit. > yes, please :) -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
