Em Qui, 2006-10-19 às 09:21 +0200, Vivien Malerba escreveu: > On 10/18/06, Gustavo R. Montesino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Em Qua, 2006-10-18 às 18:23 +0200, Vivien Malerba escreveu: > > > > > > The API should now not change anymore until the 2.0 (that is of course > > > except if there is a problem with it such as name clashes, > > > inconsistencies, etc). The next releases will be API and ABI > > > compatible with the 2.0 which is why I want it as clean as possible. > > > > > > > Great. So, if anything change the soname will also be changed, right? > > Also, is there any good reason to the soname to be libgda-3.so.3.0.0 > > instead of libgda-2.so.1.0.0? > > AFAIK libgda-2.so is used for version 1.2 of libgda and many > incompatible changes have gone into libgda so it's now libgda-3.so.
Actually, that was a typo of mine... what I wanted to ask was why not libgda-3.so.1 instead of libgda-3.so.3. But I'm happy with the way things are now, and asked just out of curiosity anyway. _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list gnome-db-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
