On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 16:37 +0200, Rodrigo Moya wrote: > On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 11:10 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > On 10/19/06, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-10-19 at 09:21 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > > > AFAIK libgda-2.so is used for version 1.2 of libgda and many > > > > incompatible changes have gone into libgda so it's now libgda-3.so. > > > > > > Did we have a good reason not to change libgda to version 3 (changing > > > the .pc file too), to fix this confusion? > > > > Rodrigo, do you know? > > no reason really, apart from just having a 1.2 -> 2.0 jump, instead of > 1.2 -> 3.0. So, I guess it wouldn't be a bad idea to use 3.0 for all, > what do you think?
I will call the new libgdamm version 3, with 3 in the .pc file name, and 3 in the .so name. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list gnome-db-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
