Hi, > Yes, the anjuta sourceview plugin is using this API a lot for different > stuff. Can you point me to the 2.0 API reference so I can review this > and possibly some other API?
You can see API documentation on http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtksourceview-2.0/unstable/index.html Please, note that due to a gtk-doc bug some function is not shown in the documentation so the ultimate reference are the public GtkSourceView header files you can find on: http://svn.gnome.org/viewcvs/gtksourceview/trunk/gtksourceview/ Note that the GtkSourceMarker API is the same as 1.x. > > I currently don't have the time to implement all this 2.0 stuff but I > think I should be able to see most of the problems from my experience > with 1.6. > > BTW, what time do you meet on IRC? We have not scheduled meetings, but you can normally find us on #gedit (irc.gnome.org) or on #ggap (irc.freenode.net). Ciao, Paolo > > Thanks and regards, > Johannes > > Paolo Maggi schrieb: > > Hi GtkSourceView users, > > > > in these days, we are reviewing the GtkSourceView 2.0 API before > > setting it to stone. > > > > The API review discussion happens on IRC and on > > http://live.gnome.org/GtkSourceView/Gsv2APIReview > > > > I'm writing this mail to ask your help. > > > > We have no direct experience in the usage of GtkSourceMarker class > > because gedit does not use it, so if you are the author of an > > application that is using the GtkSourceMarker class, please let we know > > your comments on this interface. > > > > We have found only 3 bug reports on bugzilla about GtkSourceMarker: > > > > - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132525 > > - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132821 > > - http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132784 > > > > This could mean that the API is good enough, or that the API is so bad > > that no one is really using it. So, please, let we know your comments as > > soon as possible so that we will be able to fix the API before the > > GtkSourceView 2.0 release. > > > > Ciao, > > Paolo > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > gnome-devtools mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools > > > _______________________________________________ gnome-devtools mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-devtools
