> So does this mean Do will no longer have launcher functionality? Sorry, I meant Docky, not Do.
On Oct 13, 4:32 pm, Joe <[email protected]> wrote: > So does this mean Do will no longer have launcher functionality? > > On Oct 13, 2:29 pm, Robert Dyer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Joe <[email protected]> wrote: > > > This is the first I've heard about the split too. No blueprint. No > > > No blueprint needed. Its quite simple to pull out. > > > > mailing-list post. Must be a secret kept on IRC. Sounds interesting. > > > Yes, we decided this all on IRC. There have been random hintings at > > it on the mailing list (I think) and in bug reports but nothing really > > 'official'. > > > > How is this being implemented? Is it a shared library of do-core with > > > separate branches for docky and the launcher? > > > Docky and Do are being totally split. To start with Docky2 will be > > *just a dock*. We are aiming to get some form of integration with Do, > > but I dont know if the first beta release will have that. They will > > interoperate over dbus, at some point. > > > -- > > > Robert Dyer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GNOME Do" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gnome-do?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
