Thanks for the info, Chris and Robert. It makes me wish I had the time to get on IRC more often but I'll gladly publish news of the change and the new URI for the Docky project on my blog.
On Oct 13, 2:29 pm, Robert Dyer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Joe <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is the first I've heard about the split too. No blueprint. No > > No blueprint needed. Its quite simple to pull out. > > > mailing-list post. Must be a secret kept on IRC. Sounds interesting. > > Yes, we decided this all on IRC. There have been random hintings at > it on the mailing list (I think) and in bug reports but nothing really > 'official'. > > > How is this being implemented? Is it a shared library of do-core with > > separate branches for docky and the launcher? > > Docky and Do are being totally split. To start with Docky2 will be > *just a dock*. We are aiming to get some form of integration with Do, > but I dont know if the first beta release will have that. They will > interoperate over dbus, at some point. > > -- > > Robert Dyer --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GNOME Do" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/gnome-do?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
