(CC'ing release-team...) The detection is compile-time only, but making it runtime-detected is pretty interesting. I'll look into it. Though I think for this release, with the time constraints what they are, the currently proposed patch is still the way to go.
-Alex Shaun McCance wrote: > On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 12:24 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote: >> --- Alex Graveley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> Speaking of this, I'm not really sure how the docs >>> should handle it. >>>> Most people will have distros with gtkspell and >>> will see the checkbox, >>>> but since it's optional, some people will not. >>> What should the docs >>>> reflect? >> The docs should reflect stock gnome, while pausing to >> note that free software's model of disparate >> components brought together by many different distros >> appears to make producing accurate and comprehensive >> user documentation impossible. > > I don't do this often, but in this case I'm going > to say we deviate a bit and document spell checking, > along with a note saying that spell checking may not > be enabled in the version the user is running, and > maybe a note about what to do about it. > > Alex, the selection is compile-time, right? So we > couldn't just tell users to install gtkspell and > have Tomboy pick it up? > > We can discuss details here, but definitely include > spell checking in the documentation. > > -- > Shaun > > _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
