A note has been added to the documentation regarding the spellcheck dependency on GtkSpell.
Alex Graveley wrote: > (CC'ing release-team...) > > The detection is compile-time only, but making it runtime-detected is > pretty interesting. I'll look into it. Though I think for this > release, with the time constraints what they are, the currently proposed > patch is still the way to go. > > -Alex > > Shaun McCance wrote: >> On Sun, 2006-09-03 at 12:24 +0100, Joachim Noreiko wrote: >>> --- Alex Graveley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> Speaking of this, I'm not really sure how the docs >>>> should handle it. >>>>> Most people will have distros with gtkspell and >>>> will see the checkbox, >>>>> but since it's optional, some people will not. >>>> What should the docs >>>>> reflect? >>> The docs should reflect stock gnome, while pausing to >>> note that free software's model of disparate >>> components brought together by many different distros >>> appears to make producing accurate and comprehensive >>> user documentation impossible. >> I don't do this often, but in this case I'm going >> to say we deviate a bit and document spell checking, >> along with a note saying that spell checking may not >> be enabled in the version the user is running, and >> maybe a note about what to do about it. >> >> Alex, the selection is compile-time, right? So we >> couldn't just tell users to install gtkspell and >> have Tomboy pick it up? >> >> We can discuss details here, but definitely include >> spell checking in the documentation. >> >> -- >> Shaun >> >> > _______________________________________________ > gnome-doc-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list -- Brent Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> IRC: smitten _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
