>
> Hi,
>
> Most important thing first: apologies for all the troubles that
> happened during the 2.21 cycle for translators (especially the problems
> with late new strings in gio/gvfs and the late release notes). I think
> it's been a tough cycle for you, but you've still managed to do a lot of
> hard work. And most important to me, you've been supportive of a big
> effort around gio/gvfs, which is really fantastic.
>
> I'd like to have us improve things a bit. Hopefully, we've all learnt
> from the gio/gvfs experience how to handle big core changes and I expect
> us to be able to avoid problems for translators on this side. So
> hopefully, this shouldn't happen any more :-)
>
> For release notes, we're supposed to have a freeze at least one week
> before the actual release. It didn't happen this year because we had
> problems finding people to work on the release notes. We'll try to not
> have this happen again, but we clearly need volunteers to help with the
> release notes. (this is semi-hidden call for volunteers ;-))
>
> One last item is that more and more teams are now able to translate the
> documentation, but it's very hard since it's not frozen and can change
> at the very last minute. Claude suggested on IRC that we add a new
> documentation freeze for translators: the freeze would start the
> week-end before the .0 release. This way the documentation can still be
> updated during the last week before the release and translators have a
> few days to update the translations. I think it'd make sense to lift the
> freeze after the .0 release (so documentation can still be updated
> between .0 and .1) and enforce it again the week-end before the .1
> release, and so on.
>
> Any comment about this proposal?
>
> Vincent
>
> Sound great. Maybe a bit more than one week would be nice. If we make it
two weeks then we split the UI-string freeze period in two. Essentially
giving developers 2 weeks (to update documentation) and translators 2 week
to update them. Would that be acceptable to developers ?
Regards Kenneth Nielsen
_______________________________________________
gnome-i18n mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n

Reply via email to