I agree! I have read both links, but to be honest, I have no idea what is so "new" if I skip upgrade to Plone. I need to know if this "new" gives me some interesting solutions or is just another never-to-be-used CMS system. To my experience, CMS makes more work and more problems ... To my knowledge Plone is so superfine because developers love working with it. I, on the other hand, need functionality.
There is of course possibility, that I did not understand what was written ... Matej On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Petr Kovar<[email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Lucas Rocha <[email protected]>, Sun, 7 Jun 2009 22:05:43 +0100: > >> Hi all, >> >> No comments? Just wondering why... Too complex? Couldn't understand? > > Yes, from my point of view, I think so. Actually it's obvious, a > considerable amount of us are (technical) translators, with specific, but > restricted knowledge of technological background. > > Now, give us a git repository where we can find a POT file, and we'll > happily add and/or update catalogs for our respective languages, as we're > used to when dealing with the l10n of library.gnome.org, l10n.gnome.org etc. > > Sorry, if the linked proposal suggests just the same. Just my 5 cents. > > Regards, > Petr Kovar > _______________________________________________ > gnome-i18n mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n > _______________________________________________ gnome-i18n mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-i18n
