My experience has been that the XMLRPC is just as reliable, but far more verbose, I would recommend it. It also means less worries about mail slowdowns at gnome.org.
My $0.02 -Kevin Kubasik On 2/15/06, Ross Golder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > เมื่อ พ. 2006-02-15 เวลา 08:53 -0500, Kevin Kubasik เขียนว่า: > > A thought, what are plans for CIA project stats support? There are > > Subversion scripts[1] so that's no big, but in order to keep all > > existing project stats, do you think we should give them a ping and > > coordinate to some extent? Its not an essential service, but I know I > > use it (namely its RSS feeds) to keep from updating continuously while > > waiting for a commit. > > > > *1 http://cia.navi.cx/doc/clients > > > > -Kevin Kubasik > > > > Good point. By the look of it, this is should be easy enough - we just > add their hook script to the end of the post-commit for each of the > repositories. Anyone provide any advice on which of the scripts is best, > or should I just try the XMLRPC one out? > > It doesn't look any co-ordination with them will be necessary - if I > understand it right, we just pump commit notifications at them. However, > if you think it's worth it, feel free to drop them a note to tell them > to e-mail this list if they've got any questions or requests. > > -- > Ross > > -- Cheers, Kevin Kubasik http://kubasik.net/blog
_______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
