On พ., 2006-02-15 at 13:12 -0500, Kevin Kubasik wrote: > My experience has been that the XMLRPC is just as reliable, but far > more verbose, I would recommend it. It also means less worries about > mail slowdowns at gnome.org. > > My $0.02 >
I've added the ciabot_svn.py script to post-commit file that the migration script installs for each of our repositories, using XMLRPC mode. Let's see how it goes. -- Ross > -Kevin Kubasik > On 2/15/06, Ross Golder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > เมื่อ พ. 2006-02-15 เวลา 08:53 -0500, Kevin Kubasik เขียนว่า: > > > A thought, what are plans for CIA project stats support? There are > > > Subversion scripts[1] so that's no big, but in order to keep all > > > existing project stats, do you think we should give them a ping and > > > coordinate to some extent? Its not an essential service, but I know I > > > use it (namely its RSS feeds) to keep from updating continuously while > > > waiting for a commit. > > > > > > *1 http://cia.navi.cx/doc/clients > > > > > > -Kevin Kubasik > > > > > > > Good point. By the look of it, this is should be easy enough - we just > > add their hook script to the end of the post-commit for each of the > > repositories. Anyone provide any advice on which of the scripts is best, > > or should I just try the XMLRPC one out? > > > > It doesn't look any co-ordination with them will be necessary - if I > > understand it right, we just pump commit notifications at them. However, > > if you think it's worth it, feel free to drop them a note to tell them > > to e-mail this list if they've got any questions or requests. > > > > -- > > Ross > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Kevin Kubasik > > http://kubasik.net/blog _______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
