Le jeudi 15 janvier 2009 à 22:57 +0100, Murray Cumming a écrit : > On Thu, 2009-01-15 at 22:32 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote: > > So maybe we should just drop the old habit of creating large self > > contained commits which require exhaustive ChangeLog entries: Micro > > patches that focus on just one change are much easier to review. > > But shouldn't interdependent changes be reviewed together? I generally > find that these many mini-commits make it hard for me to see the big > picture. I tend to wish that the person had combined the many > local-commits into one atomic commit when pushing it to the main > repository.
Sometimes mini-commits makes sense, sometimes not... What should prevent someone of writing a "prepare-ChangeLog"-like script that cook up a subject line followed by a multiline content with file names, and then launch a git-commit and pre-fill the commit message with this content? Claude _______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
