Mathias Hasselmann wrote: >>> Good. The correlation between pro-git people and anti-changelog people >>> has been my number one fear about a migration to git, even more than my >>> fear of people having difficulty using git. >> Taking advantage of what git provides over svn and using hand-written >> ChangeLog's are inherently incompatible. That's why you see that >> correlation. > > No, the are not. Behdad, I think I've posted this link before: > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=blob;f=lib/git-merge-changelog.c > > ChangeLog files are maintained automatically after installing this merge > handler. It allows merging and rebase without thinking about the hand- > written wChangeLog file. I use it daily for many months now, and it > works perfectly.
Thanks for the link (though, savannah is down until some CVE's are fixed). I was planning to check it out. Still, when doing micro commits, it's really annoying to have to run prepare-ChangeLog.pl, fill in the ChangeLog, commit, and get back to coding when one can just commit and write there... Cheers behdad > Ciao, > Mathias _______________________________________________ Gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
