On Mon, 2010-08-16 at 22:52 +0200, Olav Vitters wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:25:38PM -0600, Christer Edwards wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Olav Vitters <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > progress.gnome.org also works > > > In any case, bind9 is running now on progress and is acting as a slave > > to menubar. I see there are additional configured zones on other > > servers, which I've commented out until those can be configured with > > allow-transfer definitions for the new slave. Someone may need to > > inform me where these other boxes are and who to contact for them. > > If you restricted allow-transfer, you'll have to allow transfers from > all our existing slaves. Recommend being careful before making such > changes. > > Further, the whois records should be updated (otherwise it will never > know about the slave, unless badly cached).
Maybe we should just (nicely, with thanks!) ditch the other slaves? A primary and secondary should be enough for our needs. - Owen _______________________________________________ gnome-infrastructure mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-infrastructure
